Here’s a nice-looking, if very coarse-grained, map of the languages of the world. It shows the most widely spoken languages, but continent. I’m posting it mostly because I had not been aware, until I saw the data on the map, just how much less linguistically diverse North America is than any other continent shown.
But I guess that result is only due to the fact that Australia is not counted as a separate continent, but rather as part of “Asia and Pacific,” so that its overwhelmingly English-speaking population is drowned out by the languages of China, Indonesia, Japan and Indonesia.Thursday, March 19, 2009
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Shooting into a structure from within it
The Statutory Construction Blog points out this Pennsylvania opinion which asks whether one can shoot into a building that one already occupies. The court holds that one can't, since "the plain meaning of the term “into” requires that the original location is outside of the destination."
The statute in question declares the following:
Unfortunately, the court resorts to looking up "into" in the dictionary, but in this case the practice did not lead the court to the wrong result.
The government's main argument was that "from any location" is so broad that it must include any place inside the occupied structure.
I think the court got it right. If "from any location" is taken literally, we have a contradiction between this phrase and "into," which either makes the law self-contradictory, or requires that the law be constructed or interpreted in a non-contradictory way. In this case, there is no need for the court to construct a rule, because pragmatic principles of interpretation plainly allow us to limit "from any location" to mean "from any location outside the structure." The domain of "any" is more flexible than the requirement that the path described by "into" start outside of the locational reference point.
The statute in question declares the following:
A person commits an offense if he knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly discharges a firearm from any location into an occupied structure.
Unfortunately, the court resorts to looking up "into" in the dictionary, but in this case the practice did not lead the court to the wrong result.
The government's main argument was that "from any location" is so broad that it must include any place inside the occupied structure.
I think the court got it right. If "from any location" is taken literally, we have a contradiction between this phrase and "into," which either makes the law self-contradictory, or requires that the law be constructed or interpreted in a non-contradictory way. In this case, there is no need for the court to construct a rule, because pragmatic principles of interpretation plainly allow us to limit "from any location" to mean "from any location outside the structure." The domain of "any" is more flexible than the requirement that the path described by "into" start outside of the locational reference point.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
What is Language and Law?
Peter Tiersma asks: What is Language and Law? And Does Anyone Care?
I care! The paper is from the volume LAW AND LANGUAGE: THEORY AND SOCIETY, which I don’t know much about, because the product descriptions online are in a foreign language.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)